|
Dear Mayor:
The Senate President and Acting Governor has now spoken
on the SMART bill, which would have shifted a percentage
of school property taxes to the income tax. He does not
support it. In his State of the State speech, he spoke on
the Citizens' Convention bill. He said, "We must consider
... and act upon the report by Carl Van Horn and Michael
Cole on the Property Tax Convention." (Emphasis added.)
In that same speech, he also said, "The public deserves
better than false promises and unrealistic expectations."
And Senator Codey has always been a man of his word.
So we are confident that the naysayers are wrong. There
will be a Senate vote on A-5269 and ACR-25, if the bills
are approved by the Assembly. They may not pass in the Senate,
but they will be acted upon. And that is a whole lot more
than can be said about any other plan for property tax reform.
This confirms what we've been saying for the past five years.
Anyone who seriously wants to see significant and lasting
property tax reform has got to support the convention approach.
Property taxes are unfair and inequitable. They are not
based on the ability to pay and fall heaviest on those living
on fixed incomes. In our State, those with the least shoulder
a disproportionate share of the burden. Households with
incomes in the lowest 20 % pay 9.2% of their earnings in
property taxes, while the wealthiest 20 % pay 3.6% of their
income through this assessment.
New Jersey is over-reliant on this regressive revenue source.
The property tax accounts for about 45% of total State and
local tax revenue in our State. The National average is
just slightly above 30%.
The Legislature has always had the power to address the
property tax crisis. The Legislature has had ample opportunity
to address the property tax crisis. The Legislature has
NOT addressed the property tax crisis. Despite decades of
inaction, incredibly, there are those who still believe
that the Legislature, and the Legislature alone, should
have the right to accomplish significant and lasting property
tax reform. We would welcome that. But don't let anybody
tell you that that is the surest route to true reform. And
don't let anybody tell you that movement towards a property
tax convention precludes the possibility of Legislative
progress.
Legislative action on a special property tax convention
bill will do nothing to prevent the unanticipated, unprecedented
and highly unlikely prospect that the Legislature just might
decide, at long last, to lance this festering sore on the
body politic. All action on a convention bill will do is
set a time limit.
The Legislature will have until Election Day 2005 to convince
the people of New Jersey that they do not need a special
convention to get true property tax reform. If they can
do that, there will be no special convention. If they cannot,
then there has to be one.
That's our fiscal illness. A-5269 and ACR-25 could be the
cure. As our "primary care physicians," the Governor
and State Legislature don't seem to have one. So we've asked
them for a referral to a new group of "specialists."
Those we have in mind would be the delegates to a citizens'
convention for property tax reform. With property tax pressures
almost certain to intensify this year, the people of New
Jersey must be given a hope for future relief. They expect
the Senate and General Assembly, as well as Governor Codey,
to act on a property tax convention bill, in time to get
the question on this November's ballot. They need nothing
more than that. They deserve nothing less.
Please contact
your own State Senator and your representatives in the General
Assembly and urge them to support A-5269 and ACR-25.
Also, please
make certain that your municipality is represented at our
Property Tax Summit in Lawrenceville, this Friday, May 6.
You can still register on-line at www.njslom.com, or call
Ms. Dawn Mirabelli at 609-695-3481, ext. 11.
|